Westborough selectmen approve delay of medical marijuana law

By Bonnie Adams, Government Editor

Westborough – Although the state's voters approved a ballot question in November that would allow the use of marijuana for medical purposes, many municipal officials believe there is still a lot of ambiguity regarding the exact details of how that ruling will be implemented. The Westborough Board of Selectmen and Planning Board are among those officials. As a result, the selectmen approved at its Dec. 17 meeting a measure to delay the implementation of this new law for at least six months.

As the law is currently written, some portions of it go into effect Jan. 1. ?Other parts are not as clear – but they must be in place by April 1. The Massachusetts Municipal Association is advocating in extending that date to July 1.

Lester Hensley, the chair of the Planning Board, spoke at the selectmen's meeting in favor of requesting a delay in the implementation.

The Planning Board is following a “precautionary principle” approach on this issue,” he said, ?”which provides a guideline for making public policy in situations where there is no consensus on the evidence on either side of the issue.”

As 63 percent of the voters approved the article, it was the “will of the people,”” he said. But it was “a reasonable working assumption,” he added, that the voters assumed that public health and safety would “not be adversely affected” by the passage of the article.

The proposed law, as currently written, “reveals numerous undefined aspects that do not make for a well-constructed public policy,” he said.

Part of the problem was, Hensley noted, that it is up to the state's Department of Public Health to determine more specific guidelines. But that agency has been “burdened”? as of late with the State Crime Lab problems as well as the investigation into the New England Compounding Center.? As such, the DPH does not have the necessary funds or manpower at this time to fully analyze this matter.

Guidelines need to be established, Hensley ?said, as to what types of illnesses and conditions would fall into the criteria for allowing medical marijuana as a form of pain management.

“Do I believe that medical marijuana can be delivered to people who need it? I do but not the way the law is currently written,” he added.

Various law enforcements agencies have also joined the MMA in urging for the delay, he noted.

Several Mass. communities have also taken the action of banning dispensaries from their communities although those measures may end up being challenged as unlawful.

Leigh Emery, the chair of the selectmen, noted that as a nurse practitioner for many years, she had seen many patients who would have benefited from this law.

“I's very supportive of this law if it's in a very regulated way,” she added.

Selectman George Barrette said sending a letter to the town's state legislators was a prudent measure.

“There's no downsize to delaying it,” he added. “The delay is in everyone's best interest.”

Short URL: http://www.communityadvocate.com/?p=29616

Posted by on Dec 18 2012. Filed under Byline Stories, This Just In, Westborough. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

2 Comments for “Westborough selectmen approve delay of medical marijuana law”

  1. “…As 63 percent of the voters approved the article, it was the “will of the people,”” he said. But it was “a reasonable working assumption,” he added, that the voters assumed that public health and safety would “not be adversely affected” by the passage of the article…”

    Wasn’t it also the assumption that the people who voted in favor of this law also knew the part of the article which states that no more than 35 dispensaries in total and no less than 1 per county were to be opened if the law were to pass? You can also argue that they knew about the dispensaries because it was in the language at the ballot where they approved the measure so in essence they also approved the dispensaries.

    To me all this is is just excuses to prolong the process. It’s fear, ignorance and bigotry that is driving this delay, not precaution or due diligence as the chair of the Planning Board argues.

    ““The delay is in everyone”s best interest.””

    Really? Is it in the best interest of the people that need their medicine? Because while you gather up enough “cojones” to follow through with what your people voted for they will have to keep resorting to the black market for their medicine so every time you delay this longer you are sending someone into a dark alley somewhere to meet with a dangerous drug dealer and be open to dangerous any sick person should not be exposed to.

    We all know you don’t want to do this but the people have spoke and it is your JOB to follow through with their demands.

  2. Most drug dealers are not dangerous.

Leave a Reply

Please complete this math problem before clicking Submit * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.

Recently Commented

  • Doug Stone: Thanks Peter. I hope to help out in the future.
  • Doug Stone: Thanks for your support as well Gerald!
  • Gerald Griggs: This is fantastic and we in aviation appreciate what Mr. Stone and others are doing to inspire...
  • Peter Alberti: Having caught the aviation bug along with my son just over a year ago at a Young Eagles rally, I...
  • Gina Tiberio Hamilton: Thank you for printing this and raising awareness for the Walk to End Alzheimers. At $6,245,...