City council should vote “no” on funding Ward Park construction

Opinion-icon-for-website[1]To the Editor:

In Marlborough’s “Open Space and Recreation Plan” Ward Park is listed as a protected parcel. The plan tells that the reason land around the city is protected, is in order to ensure that the city preserve the quality of life now enjoyed by its residences.

Open Space and Recreation Committee (OSRC) members participating in the creation of the plan included City Councilor Delano, City Councilor Clancy, Conservation Officer Priscilla Ryder, Commissioner of Public Works Ron LaFreniere  and Director of Recreation Department David Grasso.

They wrote:

“It will be up to the Mayor, City Council, city boards, committees and residents to push for the protection of these last remaining parcels to save the remaining natural and unique character of the city.”

An OSRC survey revealed that “most residents indicated they wanted to see more open space protected for conservation and recreation purposes. Remaining land should be protected from development to protect the character of the city and quality of life…there was an overwhelming response indicating open space and recreation are high priorities for residents of Marlborough”. This overwhelming response is confirmed by the fact that over 500 current Marlborough residents have signed a petition against the development of Ward Park.

So where I ask are the voices of the OSRC participants currently involved in city government? Why are they letting the mayor treat their plan like a work of fiction? They concluded that Ward Park is protected land and that open spaces and parks are crucial to the quality of life of all residents. Why won’t any of them come forward and publically defend the document they worked so hard on?

If city council votes to approve the Ward Park construction, they are saying the designation of “protected land” is meaningless. All land is up for grabs. City officials in their silence are leaving it to residents to stand up for the principals of the document they created. We must speak out, as no one is speaking for us, certainly not anyone in city government. Tell the city council they must vote NO on funding a municipal building on Ward Park.

Michael Nickolas


Short URL: http://www.communityadvocate.com/?p=40842

Posted by on Oct 3 2013. Filed under Byline Stories, Letters to the Editor. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

1 Comment for “City council should vote “no” on funding Ward Park construction”

  1. Kudos to the councilors who stood up to the mayor and spoke the will of their constituents at the October 3rd Operations and Oversight Committee meeting.

Leave a Reply

7 - four =

Support local businesses!

Recently Commented

  • georgesedares: I find it hilarious that Shrewsbury is about to allow a growing center under the morning shadows of...
  • Community Advocate Staff: Gloria, pls contact me at 508-366-5500, ext 14 or news@communityadvocate.com. Bonnie Adams,...
  • Ben Chang: This happened two years ago. I wonder if there was any casualty or if the families affected by this...
  • Gloria gray: Hi please this case has been dismissed so I would appreciate it if you get it off your site it is...
  • Kathi Knox: To Deb’s family, I spent several years volunteering in the Littleton Schools with Deb at various...