Vote against Shrewsbury override – Pohl

To the Editor:

Regarding the Proposition? 2-1/2 override in Shrewsbury, an open letter to the town of Shrewsbury and the political group called “Community Supporters for Shrewsbury. ”

While I agree that the town has deep financial problems, I need to ask myself, WHY( ?), and how we got here. I am not a follower of politics, nor a financial expert, but it occurs to me that all this is the result of bad planning.

When I say “bad planning,” I's thinking of the new library, the high school built in the middle of nowhere (that resembles a 5 star Hilton) and a huge fire truck that needed a new building.

All of those were “special interest groups” without regard to basic town needs.

I am going to be voting “NO”‘ on Proposition? 2-1/2, not because the kids don’t need updated school books, but because the town fathers need to be responsible for bad planning, and a “no” vote would put them into a corner for their actions.

The town needs to hire an independent, responsible, financial adviser, and trade that fire engine for school books.

Stephen Pohl



Short URL: http://www.communityadvocate.com/?p=49478

Posted by on May 24 2014. Filed under Byline Stories, Editorially Speaking, Shrewsbury. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Leave a Reply

Recently Commented

  • b: I love Dennis Flynn, but he’s out of touch on this one. the “gateway drug” argument is outdated,...
  • Alicia: I came across this googling myself. I miss you so much Grandpa. You were always my shinging star growing up....
  • roger sampson: Not as great as the Needham girls were this year!
  • charlene nafey: These girls are great!
  • Mary: What a great article. Thanks to Mr. McLaughlin for sharing his personal story. My family will definitely need...